California Same-Sex Marriage
At 5 p.m. PDT (8 p.m. EDT) Monday, the California Supreme Court's May ruling creating homosexual marriage took effect and the words "Party A" and "Party B" replaced "bride" and "groom" on marriage licenses. Hundreds, if not thousands, of same-sex couples throughout California took advantage of the occasion.
The decision by the California Supreme Court — to implement its May 15 decision legalizing same-sex "marriage," despite the fact that an amendment poised to nullify that decision is now on the November ballot — poses a real and present danger to the democratic process in this state. *
Last month the court voted 4-3 to declare unconstitutional the existing law defining marriage as exactly what the great majority of Californians know it to be: the union of one man and one woman. To issue that ruling, the four-judge majority had to ignore thousands of years of legal tradition and the clear wishes of most California voters —instead deciding to experiment in lawmaking and culture-shifting.
Unfortunately, four judges facilitated that compromise by assuming the role of the legislature, dispensing with hundreds of years of unshakable legal precedent, and carelessly ignoring the votes of more than 4 million Californians.
Of course, none of that matters to those pressing the homosexual legal and political agenda.
The same-sex couples now lining up to have their "marriage" licenses approved are doing so knowing full well that such unions are under a cloud of uncertainty until November.
That's the choice California's voters will have to make, come November — a choice not only to defend marriage, but to protect the foundations of their democratic system.
I hope the ceremonies spark a backlash among California voters this fall, when they face a referendum on the ballot asking to overturn the California Court's decision. A potential backlash that will help preserve the definition of marriage as one man and one woman under the state constitution.
It's a tragic day for this country when California judges impose so-called gay marriage and the governor so easily relents to judicial activism. I think it is very wrong, and I hope it gets overturned in November.
(*) Los Angeles Times.
Regular gas in the Chicago area is well over $4 a gallon. Fortunately Sheri and I work at home. I don't know how normal people do it, commuting and filling-up twice a week!
As we pray for all those touched by Monday's tragic events, attempting to answer the "why" question, I'm sharing an excellent blog post from pastor Ed Young at 
That tragedy has been on my mind all week; probably yours too. As the story slips off the front page, here's a positive perspective.
For more, see my
Barna Releases Review of Top Religious Trends in 2005
Was it a slow news day?
Get set for what could be yet another porn boom.
Isn't it interesting how everyone — victims, media, churches, insurance industry — are calling this event an "act of God"? And we wonder, if there is a loving God, why would He allow something like this to take place? Did God fail to protect us? Why did He permit this heartbreak to occur? Good questions.
Welcome to Insidetrac -- your destination when you just can't get enough
Our friend John Tesh, along with his wife - award-winning actress Connie Sellecca - and their two children, Gib, 23 and Prima, 10, recently traveled with Operation Blessing to Sri Lanka to aid tsunami survivors.
Chocolates and flowers still abound, but Valentine's Day is acquiring a new, politically tinged layer of symbolism.
Rolling Stone magazine has reversed its decision to reject an ad for Zondervan's new Bible translation. The advertisement will run unchanged this month.

